Adolescents with pre-existing anxiety disorders use social media 40% more frequently, potentially explaining observed neural differences.

open — nothing has been offered for or against it · what this means

no sources · falsifiability unrated

0 ◎ stannebraska (329) · 7 months ago · no fields yet

Selection effects and reverse causation represent plausible alternative explanations for correlational neuroimaging findings.

rate this claim
  • Accurate 0
  • Falsifiable 0
  • Clear 0
  • Novel 0
  • Important 0

evidence

cited by (1)
[+0] Correlation between social media use and brain structure does not establish causation given confounding variables like socioeconomic status. discuss
this claim
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
whole evidence graph shown depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
what the marks mean
  • supports · opposes · cites this claim · the claim you are reading
  • [+9] net votes on the evidence link — whether this is good evidence here, not whether the claim itself is true
  • Af··· accurate, falsifiable, clear, novel, important — a capital is established, lowercase weak, unrated; no strip at all where nothing has been rated yet
  • [?] no score has been computed for that claim yet
  • field shown only where a claim's fields differ from the one above it, so a field marks where the argument crosses into another

respondeo

Loading responses… open them

discussion

Log in to join the discussion.