A 2023 direct replication of Ojeda et al. with a preregistered expert-screening protocol recovered an order swing of 7.4 points
[unresolved]
[no evidence]
[quiet]
[stable]
[undecided]
Kwan and Petrossian recruited 214 philosophers who had published at least one peer-reviewed paper engaging trolley cases, screened via publication records rather than conference attendance. The order effect shrank but remained significant (7.4 points, 95% CI [2.1, 12.7]). A prespecified subgroup of 41 authors of book-length treatments showed a non-significant 3.1-point swing.
Accurate
(+0)
Falsifiable
(+0)
Clear
(+0)
Novel
(+0)
Important
(+0)
▸ Score Details
Cited as evidence in 1 claim:
Order effects on trolley cases persist among professional p…
(supports)
cited by (1)
cited as supports by:
[+0]
Order effects on trolley cases persist among professional philosophers with AOS in ethics (Ojeda et al., 2022, N=387)
experimental-philosophy
metaphilosophy
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim:
A 2023 direct replication of Ojeda et al. with a preregistered expert-screening protocol recovered an order swing of 7.4 points
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
Evidence Supporting (0)
No supporting evidence yet.
Evidence Against (0)
No opposing evidence yet.
Respondeo
Loading responses...
Log in to join the discussion.