up [0] down

A 2023 direct replication of Ojeda et al. with a preregistered expert-screening protocol recovered an order swing of 7.4 points

Submitted by kwan_pet (18) 2 days, 13 hours ago
[unresolved] [no evidence] [quiet] [stable] [undecided]

Kwan and Petrossian recruited 214 philosophers who had published at least one peer-reviewed paper engaging trolley cases, screened via publication records rather than conference attendance. The order effect shrank but remained significant (7.4 points, 95% CI [2.1, 12.7]). A prespecified subgroup of 41 authors of book-length treatments showed a non-significant 3.1-point swing.

Accurate (+0)
Falsifiable (+0)
Clear (+0)
Novel (+0)
Important (+0)
▸ Score Details

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
cited by (1)
cited as supports by: [+0] Order effects on trolley cases persist among professional philosophers with AOS in ethics (Ojeda et al., 2022, N=387) experimental-philosophy metaphilosophy virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim: A 2023 direct replication of Ojeda et al. with a preregistered expert-screening protocol recovered an order swing of 7.4 points
[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 33.9 consensus 0 depth 0.0
experimental-philosophy replication virtues Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
Evidence Supporting (0)

No supporting evidence yet.

Evidence Against (0)

No opposing evidence yet.

Respondeo

Loading responses...