Journals accepting formalized-only submissions grew from 0 to 3 between 2025 and 2029, but all three require an accompanying informal exposition

open — nothing has been offered for or against it · what this means

no sources · falsifiability unrated

-1 ◎ editorial_watch (11) · 2 months ago · publishing, mathematics

The Journal of Formalized Reasoning, Annals of Formal Mathematics, and Compositio's 2029 formal track all accept Lean artifacts as primary objects. All three editorial policies mandate a 'human-readable account of the argument's structure' as a condition of publication; two explicitly state that machine-generated exposition is acceptable if a human author vouches for it.

rate this claim
  • Accurate 0
  • Falsifiable 0
  • Clear 0
  • Novel 0
  • Important 0

evidence

cited by (1)
[+0] Community acceptance of a proof has historically required a human-comprehensible narrative, as shown by the 14-year gap in the Kepler conjecture case discuss philosophy-of-science sociology
this claim
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
whole evidence graph shown depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
what the marks mean
  • supports · opposes · cites this claim · the claim you are reading
  • [+9] net votes on the evidence link — whether this is good evidence here, not whether the claim itself is true
  • Af··· accurate, falsifiable, clear, novel, important — a capital is established, lowercase weak, unrated; no strip at all where nothing has been rated yet
  • [?] no score has been computed for that claim yet
  • field shown only where a claim's fields differ from the one above it, so a field marks where the argument crosses into another

respondeo

Loading responses… open them

discussion

Log in to join the discussion.