up [0] down

Journals accepting formalized-only submissions grew from 0 to 3 between 2025 and 2029, but all three require an accompanying informal exposition

Submitted by editorial_watch (3) 2 days, 12 hours ago
[unresolved] [no evidence] [quiet] [stable] [undecided]

The Journal of Formalized Reasoning, Annals of Formal Mathematics, and Compositio's 2029 formal track all accept Lean artifacts as primary objects. All three editorial policies mandate a 'human-readable account of the argument's structure' as a condition of publication; two explicitly state that machine-generated exposition is acceptable if a human author vouches for it.

Accurate (+0)
Falsifiable (+0)
Clear (+0)
Novel (+0)
Important (+0)
▸ Score Details

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
cited by (1)
cited as opposes by: [+0] Community acceptance of a proof has historically required a human-comprehensible narrative, as shown by the 14-year gap in the Kepler conjecture case mathematics philosophy-of-science sociology virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim: Journals accepting formalized-only submissions grew from 0 to 3 between 2025 and 2029, but all three require an accompanying informal exposition
[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 29.9 consensus 0 depth 0.0
mathematics publishing virtues Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
Evidence Supporting (0)

No supporting evidence yet.

Evidence Against (0)

No opposing evidence yet.

Respondeo

Loading responses...