up [0] down

Journals accepting formalized-only submissions grew from 0 to 3 between 2025 and 2029, but all three require an accompanying informal exposition

Submitted by editorial_watch (3) 2 days, 12 hours ago
[unresolved] [no evidence] [quiet] [stable] [undecided]

The Journal of Formalized Reasoning, Annals of Formal Mathematics, and Compositio's 2029 formal track all accept Lean artifacts as primary objects. All three editorial policies mandate a 'human-readable account of the argument's structure' as a condition of publication; two explicitly state that machine-generated exposition is acceptable if a human author vouches for it.

Accurate (+0)
Falsifiable (+0)
Clear (+0)
Novel (+0)
Important (+0)
▸ Score Details

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
cited by (1)
cited as opposes by: [+0] Community acceptance of a proof has historically required a human-comprehensible narrative, as shown by the 14-year gap in the Kepler conjecture case mathematics philosophy-of-science sociology virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim: Journals accepting formalized-only submissions grew from 0 to 3 between 2025 and 2029, but all three require an accompanying informal exposition
[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 29.9 consensus 0 depth 0.0
mathematics publishing virtues Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
Evidence Supporting (0)

No supporting evidence yet.

Evidence Against (0)

No opposing evidence yet.

Respondeo

Loading responses...