Combusted substances weigh less than their pre-combusted states
[unresolved]
[moderate]
[quiet]
[stable]
[undecided]
Combusted substances weigh less than their pre-combusted states because of the release of phlogiston
Accurate
(+0)
Falsifiable
(+0)
Clear
(+0)
Novel
(+0)
Important
(+0)
▸ Score Details
Cited as evidence in 1 claim:
Fire is caused by the release of phlogiston
(supports)
cited by (1)
cited as supports by:
[+0]
Fire is caused by the release of phlogiston
chemistry
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim:
Combusted substances weigh less than their pre-combusted states
supports (3)
supports:
[+2]
Wood weighs less after combustion
chemistry
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports:
[+1]
The weight of some metalic substances increases after combustion
chemistry
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports: [+0] I am testing the creation of new evidence through the form. virtues: Accurate +1 · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel +1 · Important +1
loading 1 more…
opposes (2)
opposes:
[+0]
I picked the wrong evidence side for this claim and can't delete my claim so I edited it
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
opposes:
[+0]
The weight of some metalic substances increases after combustion
chemistry
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
Evidence Supporting (3)
I am testing the creation of new evidence through the form.
1 supporting / 0 opposing
Respondeo
Loading responses...
Log in to join the discussion.
Was able to add the same claim to both sides of the argument
The title and the description are making distinct claims. The description adds a cause to the claim of the title. How can we evaluate the claim in the title independently of the cause attributed in the description?
In this case, the point is moot because the both claims are false.
Accidentally added the claim to supporting evidence instead of opposing evidence. Cannot remove it.