up [0] down

Combusted substances weigh less than their pre-combusted states

Submitted by SonOfPeleus (239) 9 months, 3 weeks ago
[unresolved] [moderate] [quiet] [stable] [undecided]

Combusted substances weigh less than their pre-combusted states because of the release of phlogiston

Accurate (+0)
Falsifiable (+0)
Clear (+0)
Novel (+0)
Important (+0)
▸ Score Details
Cited as evidence in 1 claim: Fire is caused by the release of phlogiston (supports)

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
cited by (1)
cited as supports by: [+0] Fire is caused by the release of phlogiston chemistry virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim: Combusted substances weigh less than their pre-combusted states
[+0] validity 0.6 centrality 16.8 consensus 1 depth 1.6
chemistry virtues Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports (3)
supports: [+2] Wood weighs less after combustion chemistry virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports: [+1] The weight of some metalic substances increases after combustion chemistry virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports: [+0] I am testing the creation of new evidence through the form. virtues: Accurate +1 · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel +1 · Important +1
supports: [+0] If you leave, I won't cry. music testing virtues: Accurate -1 · Falsifiable +1 · Clear +1 · Novel unrated · Important unrated
Evidence Supporting (3)
up [2] down
up [0] down
I am testing the creation of new evidence through the form.
admin (73) · 7 months, 4 weeks ago · discuss
1 supporting / 0 opposing

Respondeo

Loading responses...

SonOfPeleus (239) 9 months, 3 weeks ago | up / down [1]

Was able to add the same claim to both sides of the argument

SonOfPeleus (239) 9 months, 3 weeks ago | up / down [0]

The title and the description are making distinct claims. The description adds a cause to the claim of the title. How can we evaluate the claim in the title independently of the cause attributed in the description?

SonOfPeleus (239) 9 months, 3 weeks ago | up / down [0]

In this case, the point is moot because the both claims are false.

SonOfPeleus (239) 9 months, 3 weeks ago | up / down [0]

Accidentally added the claim to supporting evidence instead of opposing evidence. Cannot remove it.