Reanalysis of the Ferreiro & Adeyemi cells using a hierarchical ordinal model finds subadditivity of stacked framing manipulations (ratio 0.62)

open — nothing has been offered for or against it · what this means

no sources · falsifiability unrated

0 ◎ g_ntumba (3) · 2 months ago · statistics, experimental-philosophy

An independent reanalysis by Ntumba (2024) fit a cumulative-link mixed model to the raw item-level data, estimating that combined manipulations produce 62% of the sum of their individual effects (95% CI [0.51, 0.74]). The subadditivity is strongest among manipulations sharing a hypothesized affective pathway, consistent with a shared saturating mechanism rather than independent additive biases.

rate this claim
  • Accurate 0
  • Falsifiable 0
  • Clear 0
  • Novel 0
  • Important 0

evidence

cited by (1)
[+0] The 19-point minimum asymmetry gap exceeds the largest single framing effect (18 points) recorded across the same protocol discuss
this claim
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
whole evidence graph shown depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
what the marks mean
  • supports · opposes · cites this claim · the claim you are reading
  • [+9] net votes on the evidence link — whether this is good evidence here, not whether the claim itself is true
  • Af··· accurate, falsifiable, clear, novel, important — a capital is established, lowercase weak, unrated; no strip at all where nothing has been rated yet
  • [?] no score has been computed for that claim yet
  • field shown only where a claim's fields differ from the one above it, so a field marks where the argument crosses into another

respondeo

Loading responses… open them

discussion

Log in to join the discussion.