up [0] down

Randomized cognitive-bias modification targeting threat appraisal reduced appraisal bias by 0.62 SD but depression symptoms by only 0.08 SD at 12 months

Submitted by trialist_kb (18) 2 days, 13 hours ago
[unresolved] [no evidence] [quiet] [stable] [undecided]

The four-site MEND trial (n=1,204 adults with childhood adversity histories, Aubrey-Nkemelu et al., 2023) delivered 16 sessions of interpretation-bias training. The mechanistic target moved substantially and durably, yet depression outcomes were near-null (BDI-II difference 1.2 points, 95% CI -0.4 to 2.8), with no dose-response relation between bias change and symptom change.

Accurate (+0)
Falsifiable (+0)
Clear (+0)
Novel (+0)
Important (+0)
▸ Score Details

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
cited by (1)
cited as opposes by: [+0] Childhood adversity raises adult depression risk primarily through altered threat-appraisal learning rather than inherited liability shared with parents behavior-genetics developmental-psychopathology psychology virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim: Randomized cognitive-bias modification targeting threat appraisal reduced appraisal bias by 0.62 SD but depression symptoms by only 0.08 SD at 12 months
[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 17.6 consensus 0 depth 0.0
clinical-psychology randomized-trials virtues Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
opposes (1)
opposes: [+0] A dose-response analysis of MEND found no symptom benefit even among the top decile of bias-change responders (d = 0.11, ns) clinical-psychology randomized-trials virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
Evidence Supporting (0)

No supporting evidence yet.

Evidence Against (1)
up [0] down
A dose-response analysis of MEND found no symptom benefit even among the top de…
Pre-empts the most common defense of null mechanistic trials — that only some participants engaged the mechanism. If even strong mechanism-movers show no benefit, the mediator looks less causally potent, unless the measured bias is a poor proxy for the developmental construct.
trialist_kb (18) · 2 days, 13 hours ago · discuss

Respondeo

Loading responses...