← back to claim No automated system has produced a proof requiring a definition absent from its training library, across 11 documented research-level attempts

evidence graph

cited by (1)
[+0] By 2035 a machine-generated proof of a previously open Annals-level conjecture will be formally verified in Lean and accepted without a human-written proof sketch discuss [i] ai-forecasting
No automated system has produced a proof requiring a definition absent from its training library, across 11 documented research-level attempts
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
opposes (1)
[+0] The 2028 survey's six 'requires new construction' problems were rated by referees who knew the eventual human solution in four cases discuss [i] research-methods
[+0] Inter-rater agreement on 'requires new mathematical machinery' judgments is κ = 0.31 among 22 research mathematicians shown 40 solved problems discuss [i]
whole evidence graph shown depth 1 2 3 both pro con
what the marks mean
  • supports · opposes · cites this claim · the claim you are reading
  • [+9] net votes on the evidence link — whether this is good evidence here, not whether the claim itself is true
  • Af··· accurate, falsifiable, clear, novel, important — a capital is established, lowercase weak, unrated; no strip at all where nothing has been rated yet
  • [?] no score has been computed for that claim yet
  • field shown only where a claim's fields differ from the one above it, so a field marks where the argument crosses into another
inspector

Select a link’s marker to see who asserted it, why, and what it cites.