Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier proved this is false
[unresolved]
[no evidence]
[quiet]
[stable]
[undecided]
Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier said so, it has to be true
Accurate
(+0)
Falsifiable
(+0)
Clear
(+0)
Novel
(+0)
Important
(+0)
▸ Score Details
Cited as evidence in 3 claims:
April is the cruelest month
(opposes)
·
Phlogiston Theory is a debunked 18th century scientific the…
(supports)
·
Fire is caused by the release of phlogiston
(opposes)
cited by (3)
cited as opposes by:
[+0]
April is the cruelest month
poetry
virtues: Accurate +1 · Falsifiable -1 · Clear -1 · Novel +1 · Important -1
cited as supports by:
[+0]
Phlogiston Theory is a debunked 18th century scientific theory
history-of-science
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
cited as opposes by:
[+0]
Fire is caused by the release of phlogiston
chemistry
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim:
Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier proved this is false
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
Evidence Supporting (0)
No supporting evidence yet.
Evidence Against (0)
No opposing evidence yet.
Respondeo
Loading responses...
Log in to join the discussion.
Multiple claims are using this claim as evidence. If it's edited to correct the Argument from Authority, it may not work for every claim where it is used as evidence. For instance, if this is edited to explain how Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier's phlogiston experiments debunked phlogiston theory, it will not make sense opposing the claim "April is the cruelest month".
The description is making an argument from authority. It could be edited to correct it, but the tag would remain. In this case, the tag could be deleted, but what happens if the tag still applies but is less applicable than it was, for example, a misleading statement that was edited to be less misleading.