Circular Reasoning Is Valid

open — on 1 supporting to 0 opposing, weighted -1.4 · minimal · what this means

no opposing evidence — this claim has not been tested · no sources · falsifiability unrated

-1 SonOfPeleus (239) · 11 months ago · no fields yet

Circular Reasoning Is Valid

rate this claim
  • Accurate 0
  • Falsifiable 0
  • Clear 0
  • Novel 0
  • Important 0

evidence

cited by (1)
[+0] Circular Reasoning Works discuss
this claim
supports (1)
[+0] Circular Reasoning Works discuss 1 more
1 more — see its evidence
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
1 claim beyond depth 1 not shown — [go deeper] depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
what the marks mean
  • supports · opposes · cites this claim · the claim you are reading
  • [+9] net votes on the evidence link — whether this is good evidence here, not whether the claim itself is true
  • Af··· accurate, falsifiable, clear, novel, important — a capital is established, lowercase weak, unrated; no strip at all where nothing has been rated yet
  • [?] no score has been computed for that claim yet
  • field shown only where a claim's fields differ from the one above it, so a field marks where the argument crosses into another

respondeo

Loading responses… open them

discussion

Log in to join the discussion.