Circular Reasoning Is Valid

open — on 1 supporting to 0 opposing, weighted -1.4 · minimal · what this means

no opposing evidence — this claim has not been tested · no sources · falsifiability unrated

-1 SonOfPeleus (239) · 11 months ago · no fields yet

rate this claim

evidence

cited by (1)

[+0] Circular Reasoning Works discuss

[+0] Circular Reasoning Is Valid discuss

this claim

supports (1)

[+0] Circular Reasoning Works discuss

whole evidence graph shown depth 1 2 3 both pro con full

what the marks mean

supports · opposes · cites this claim · the claim you are reading
[+9] net votes on the evidence link — whether this is good evidence here, not whether the claim itself is true
Af··· accurate, falsifiable, clear, novel, important — a capital is established, lowercase weak, unrated; no strip at all where nothing has been rated yet
[?] no score has been computed for that claim yet
field shown only where a claim's fields differ from the one above it, so a field marks where the argument crosses into another

Loading responses… open them