← back to claim bruh yr site is sus 100% rn.

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con
this claim: bruh yr site is sus 100% rn.
[+2] validity 2.0 centrality 0.0 consensus 4 depth 0.0
testing virtues Accurate +1 · Falsifiable -1 · Clear -1 · Novel +1 · Important +1
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
inspector

Select a link’s inspect marker to see who asserted it, why, and what it cites.