← back to claim Circular Reasoning Works

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con
cited by (1)
[+0] Circular Reasoning Is Valid [i]
[+0] Circular Reasoning Works [i]
Circular Reasoning Works
[-1] validity -1.4 centrality 100.0 consensus -3 depth 0.3
no field tags yet virtues
supports (1)
[+0] Circular Reasoning Is Valid [i]
whole evidence graph shown
inspector

Select a link’s marker to see who asserted it, why, and what it cites.