Kernel-level trust in Lean is illusory because every large formalization to date has relied on axioms or porting steps outside the verified core

open — nothing has been offered for or against it · what this means

no sources · falsifiability unrated

-1 ◎ kernel_purist_9 (13) · 2 months ago · logic, formal-verification

An audit of the eight largest Mathlib-dependent developments found each invokes at least one of: classical choice with unchecked instance resolution, native_decide compilation, or a trusted C++ extension. Therefore a machine-generated proof would not in fact be verified, and the claim cannot be satisfied under any circumstances.

rate this claim
  • Accurate +1
  • Falsifiable 0
  • Clear 0
  • Novel 0
  • Important 0

evidence

cited by (1)
[+0] By 2035 a machine-generated proof of a previously open Annals-level conjecture will be formally verified in Lean and accepted without a human-written proof sketch discuss ai-forecasting mathematics
this claim
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
whole evidence graph shown depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
what the marks mean
  • supports · opposes · cites this claim · the claim you are reading
  • [+9] net votes on the evidence link — whether this is good evidence here, not whether the claim itself is true
  • Af··· accurate, falsifiable, clear, novel, important — a capital is established, lowercase weak, unrated; no strip at all where nothing has been rated yet
  • [?] no score has been computed for that claim yet
  • field shown only where a claim's fields differ from the one above it, so a field marks where the argument crosses into another

respondeo

Loading responses… open them

discussion

Log in to join the discussion.