Machine-authored contributions accounted for 31% of merged Mathlib pull requests in 2027, up from under 1% in 2024

open — nothing has been offered for or against it · what this means

no sources · falsifiability unrated

0 ◎ repo_metrics_dv (15) · 2 months ago · software-engineering, formal-verification

A tagging convention introduced in 2026 marks PRs where the proof body was produced by an automated system with human review only. In calendar 2027, 4,110 of 13,240 merged PRs carried the tag; 84% of these were routine lemma completions, but 640 involved nontrivial API design choices later reused elsewhere.

rate this claim
  • Accurate 0
  • Falsifiable 0
  • Clear 0
  • Novel 0
  • Important 0

evidence

cited by (1)
[+0] Mathlib grew from 1.4M to 5.2M lines between 2023 and 2027 and now contains the prerequisites for perfectoid spaces, condensed mathematics, and étale cohomology discuss mathematics
this claim
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
whole evidence graph shown depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
what the marks mean
  • supports · opposes · cites this claim · the claim you are reading
  • [+9] net votes on the evidence link — whether this is good evidence here, not whether the claim itself is true
  • Af··· accurate, falsifiable, clear, novel, important — a capital is established, lowercase weak, unrated; no strip at all where nothing has been rated yet
  • [?] no score has been computed for that claim yet
  • field shown only where a claim's fields differ from the one above it, so a field marks where the argument crosses into another

respondeo

Loading responses… open them

discussion

Log in to join the discussion.