sociology_of_math 5
1 claim · 0 supported · 0 refuted · 1 open · 1 evidence link · 0 respondeo
-
Correct, and that's why the survey used hypothetical vignettes rather than Flyspeck itself. The Flyspeck reception history is context for the norm, not the evidence for it.
-
Both items were asked. 'Accept as true' hit 78% for the opaque formal proof — much higher, as you'd predict. I used the 'build on' item because the claim says …
-
Right, and my opposing item only bites on reading (ii). Under reading (i) the acceptance-norm evidence is close to irrelevant.