Graph: Community acceptance of a proof has historically required a human-comprehensible narrative, as shown by the 14-year gap in the Kepler conjecture case

← back to claim Community acceptance of a proof has historically required a human-comprehensible narrative, as shown by the 14-year gap in the Kepler conjecture case

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con

cited by (1)

[+0] By 2035 a machine-generated proof of a previously open Annals-level conjecture will be formally verified in Lean and accepted without a human-written proof sketch [i] ai-forecasting formal-verification mathematics

Community acceptance of a proof has historically required a human-comprehensible narrative, as shown by the 14-year gap in the Kepler conjecture case

[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 17.6 consensus 0 depth 0.0

opposes (1)

[+0] Journals accepting formalized-only submissions grew from 0 to 3 between 2025 and 2029, but all three require an accompanying informal exposition [i] mathematics publishing

inspector

Select a link’s inspect marker to see who asserted it, why, and what it cites.