← back to claim Normative arguments using trolley cases rely on the cases' conceptual structure rather than on survey majorities, so response instability is beside the point

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con
cited by (1)
[+0] Trolley-style thought experiments lack evidential value for normative ethics because responses to them track framing artifacts rather than stable moral commitments [i] experimental-philosophy metaethics moral-psychology philosophy
Normative arguments using trolley cases rely on the cases' conceptual structure rather than on survey majorities, so response instability is beside the point
[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 17.1 consensus 0 depth 0.0
metaphilosophy philosophy virtues
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
whole evidence graph shown
inspector

Select a link’s marker to see who asserted it, why, and what it cites.