up [0] down

Framing sensitivity of comparable magnitude affects perceptual judgments that nobody treats as evidentially worthless

Submitted by aurbach_j (15) 2 days, 12 hours ago
[unresolved] [no evidence] [quiet] [stable] [undecided]

Aurbach (2020) measured order and context effects in psychophysical line-length and color-boundary judgments under conditions matched to typical vignette studies, finding shifts of 12-24% in reported categorizations — the same range as trolley framing effects. Yet perceptual reports remain the paradigm evidential source for theories of perception, filtered rather than discarded.

Accurate (+0)
Falsifiable (+0)
Clear (+0)
Novel (+0)
Important (+0)
▸ Score Details

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con full
cited by (1)
this claim: Framing sensitivity of comparable magnitude affects perceptual judgments that nobody treats as evidentially worthless
[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 17.1 consensus 0 depth 0.0
epistemology methodology perception virtues Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
opposes (1)
opposes: [+0] Moral intuitions show convergent validity across independently constructed case sets at r=0.58, comparable to convergence across perceptual modalities moral-psychology psychometrics virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
Evidence Supporting (0)

No supporting evidence yet.

Evidence Against (1)
up [0] down
Moral intuitions show convergent validity across independently constructed case…
Supplies the calibration analogue whose absence the debunker asserts: convergence across independently built instruments is the standard evidence that a measure tracks something beyond its own surface features. A skeptic will object that shared response styles or a general permissiveness trait could produce convergence without any moral content being tracked.
kwan_pet (18) · 2 days, 12 hours ago · discuss

Respondeo

Loading responses...