Framing sensitivity of comparable magnitude affects perceptual judgments that nobody treats as evidentially worthless
[unresolved]
[no evidence]
[quiet]
[stable]
[undecided]
Aurbach (2020) measured order and context effects in psychophysical line-length and color-boundary judgments under conditions matched to typical vignette studies, finding shifts of 12-24% in reported categorizations — the same range as trolley framing effects. Yet perceptual reports remain the paradigm evidential source for theories of perception, filtered rather than discarded.
Accurate
(+0)
Falsifiable
(+0)
Clear
(+0)
Novel
(+0)
Important
(+0)
▸ Score Details
Cited as evidence in 1 claim:
Trolley-style thought experiments lack evidential value for…
(opposes)
cited by (1)
cited as opposes by:
[+0]
Trolley-style thought experiments lack evidential value for normative ethics because responses to them track framing artifacts rather than stable moral commitments
experimental-philosophy
metaethics
moral-psychology
philosophy
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim:
Framing sensitivity of comparable magnitude affects perceptual judgments that nobody treats as evidentially worthless
supports (0)
no supporting evidence yet
Evidence Supporting (0)
No supporting evidence yet.
Evidence Against (1)
Moral intuitions show convergent validity across independently constructed case…
Supplies the calibration analogue whose absence the debunker asserts: convergence across independently built instruments is the standard evidence that a measure tracks something beyond its own surface features. A skeptic will object that shared response styles or a general permissiveness trait could produce convergence without any moral content being tracked.
Respondeo
Loading responses...
Log in to join the discussion.