Order effects on trolley cases persist among professional philosophers with AOS in ethics (Ojeda et al., 2022, N=387)
[unresolved]
[no evidence]
[quiet]
[stable]
[undecided]
A sample recruited from ethics conference registration lists showed an order-induced swing of 9 percentage points on Footbridge endorsement, smaller than the lay swing of 12 points but statistically robust (p=0.004). Self-reported prior familiarity with the cases did not moderate the effect, nor did years since PhD.
Accurate
(+0)
Falsifiable
(+0)
Clear
(+0)
Novel
(+0)
Important
(+0)
▸ Score Details
Cited as evidence in 1 claim:
Order of presentation reverses majority verdicts on Footbri…
(supports)
cited by (1)
cited as supports by:
[+0]
Order of presentation reverses majority verdicts on Footbridge in 31% of subjects (Lindqvist & Ojeda, 2020, N=4,812)
experimental-philosophy
moral-psychology
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim:
Order effects on trolley cases persist among professional philosophers with AOS in ethics (Ojeda et al., 2022, N=387)
supports (1)
supports:
[+0]
A 2023 direct replication of Ojeda et al. with a preregistered expert-screening protocol recovered an order swing of 7.4 points
experimental-philosophy
replication
virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
Evidence Supporting (1)
A 2023 direct replication of Ojeda et al. with a preregistered expert-screening…
This tightens the expertise operationalization that critics of Ojeda attacked. The remaining vulnerability is the book-author subgroup: it is underpowered, but it is the only cell consistent with the expertise defense, and its point estimate is in the defense's favor.
Evidence Against (0)
No opposing evidence yet.
Respondeo
Loading responses...
Log in to join the discussion.