← back to claim Order effects on trolley cases persist among professional philosophers with AOS in ethics (Ojeda et al., 2022, N=387)

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con
cited by (1)
cited as supports by: [+0] Order of presentation reverses majority verdicts on Footbridge in 31% of subjects (Lindqvist & Ojeda, 2020, N=4,812) centre graph here [i]inspect this link experimental-philosophy moral-psychology virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
this claim: Order effects on trolley cases persist among professional philosophers with AOS in ethics (Ojeda et al., 2022, N=387)
[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 22.3 consensus 0 depth 0.0
experimental-philosophy metaphilosophy virtues Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
supports (1)
supports: [+0] A 2023 direct replication of Ojeda et al. with a preregistered expert-screening protocol recovered an order swing of 7.4 points centre graph here [i]inspect this link experimental-philosophy replication virtues: Accurate unrated · Falsifiable unrated · Clear unrated · Novel unrated · Important unrated
opposes (0)
no opposing evidence yet
inspector

Select a link’s inspect marker to see who asserted it, why, and what it cites.