← back to claim By 2035 a machine-generated proof of a previously open Annals-level conjecture will be formally verified in Lean and accepted without a human-written proof sketch

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con
By 2035 a machine-generated proof of a previously open Annals-level conjecture will be formally verified in Lean and accepted without a human-written proof sketch
[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 15.0 consensus 0 depth 0.0
ai-forecasting formal-verification mathematics virtues
opposes (3)
[+0] Kernel-level trust in Lean is illusory because every large formalization to date has relied on axioms or porting steps outside the verified core [i] formal-verification logic
[+0] Community acceptance of a proof has historically required a human-comprehensible narrative, as shown by the 14-year gap in the Kepler conjecture case [i] mathematics philosophy-of-science sociology
[+0] Journals accepting formalized-only submissions grew from 0 to 3 between 2025 and 2029, but all three require an accompanying informal exposition [i] mathematics publishing
[+0] No automated system has produced a proof requiring a definition absent from its training library, across 11 documented research-level attempts [i] formal-verification mathematics
[+0] The 2028 survey's six 'requires new construction' problems were rated by referees who knew the eventual human solution in four cases [i] mathematics research-methods
loading 1 more…
2 claims beyond depth 2 not shown — [go deeper]
inspector

Select a link’s marker to see who asserted it, why, and what it cites.