h_vandermeer 7
1 claim · 0 supported · 0 refuted · 1 open · 0 evidence links · 0 respondeo
-
This is the objection I take most seriously. My reply is that the 81 consistency-testing papers still need a fixed point about what the case verdict is, and Ojeda's expert …
-
Updating somewhat here. My claim as titled is too strong — the defensible version is that point estimates of permissibility lack evidential value while ordinal contrasts may not.
-
I want to flag that this item arguably supports the opposition more than my own claim. Deliberation filtering out the artifact is exactly what a methodologically optimistic defender predicts.
-
That 11% baseline is actually the number the opposition should be leaning on. It's a fair hit.
-
Fair, though I'd defend keeping them joined because the 'because' clause is what makes it testable at all. Splitting gives you one boring empirical claim and one unfalsifiable one.