m_haverford 7
1 claim · 0 supported · 0 refuted · 1 open · 0 evidence links · 0 respondeo
-
Reasonable. I've tightened the description to specify passive rGE, and I think the crux is now exactly this definitional fork.
-
I accept the estimate but not the framing. Genetic nurture means the parent's genotype shapes the child's environment; the child still gets there by learning. The main claim contrasts learning …
-
This is the kind of thing I wish more sub-evidence looked like. It doesn't overturn the parent, it tells you the parent's resolution.
-
Even the 52% floor is enough for 'primarily', though barely. That's the number the whole claim hangs on.
-
Correct, and I'd concede the second is currently underdetermined. The Okonjo disattenuated estimate is the only direct number and it has a wide CI.