Graph: Trolley-style thought experiments lack evidential value for normative ethics because responses to them track framing artifacts rather than stable moral commitments

← back to claim Trolley-style thought experiments lack evidential value for normative ethics because responses to them track framing artifacts rather than stable moral commitments

evidence graph

depth 1 2 3 both pro con

Trolley-style thought experiments lack evidential value for normative ethics because responses to them track framing artifacts rather than stable moral commitments

[+0] validity 0.0 centrality 15.0 consensus 0 depth 0.0

experimental-philosophy metaethics moral-psychology philosophy virtues

supports (3)

[+0] Trolley intuitions are a cultural artifact of Anglophone analytic training and are absent in most human societies [i] anthropology experimental-philosophy

[+0] Verdicts on Footbridge shift 18 points when the victim is described as 'a large man' versus 'a person wearing a heavy backpack', despite causal structure being identical [i] experimental-philosophy moral-psychology

[+0] Endorsement differences between physical-contact and lever variants vanish under a 90-second forced-deliberation delay (Petrossian, 2022) [i] dual-process moral-psychology

[+0] Order of presentation reverses majority verdicts on Footbridge in 31% of subjects (Lindqvist & Ojeda, 2020, N=4,812) [i] experimental-philosophy moral-psychology

[+0] Trolley verdicts show test-retest reliability of r=0.34 at six months, versus r=0.71 for the same subjects' abortion and capital punishment attitudes [i] moral-psychology psychometrics

[+0] Order effects on trolley cases persist among professional philosophers with AOS in ethics (Ojeda et al., 2022, N=387) [i] experimental-philosophy metaphilosophy

loading 1 more…

inspector

Select a link’s inspect marker to see who asserted it, why, and what it cites.