The vote is on the link: is “Threat-generalization gradients at age 14 predicted depression onset at age 26 …” good evidence
for the claim?
Directly addresses the prodrome objection: if generalization were merely an early expression of depression, it should carry no predictive weight in adolescents who are symptom-free for four subsequent years. A skeptic can still argue subclinical questionnaires miss early pathology.
the evidence
Restricting the Okonjo cohort to the 902 participants scoring below clinical threshold on the MFQ at every assessment through age 18, steeper age-14 generalization still predicted adult onset (HR 1.41 per SD, p = .003). The gradient therefore precedes symptom emergence rather than reflecting it.
the claim
Okonjo, Reiss & Vance (2022) followed 1,478 adolescents with baseline adversity interviews, annual conditioning assessments (differential fear acquisition and generalization to perceptual morphs), and adult depression outcomes. Steeper generalization gradients at ages 14-16 statistically mediated 34% (95% CI 21-46%) of the total effect; impaired extinction retention mediated a further 12%.
MFQ below threshold is a coarse screen. Did they have any interview-based assessment for the restricted subsample?